Albert Mechlenburg Moller vs Hans Endrup Jacobsen
2018 · Result ½–½ · Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Albert Mechlenburg Moller vs Hans Endrup Jacobsen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Albert Mechlenburg Moller (1704)
- Black
- Hans Endrup Jacobsen (1946)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85)
About this chess game
This chess game between Albert Mechlenburg Moller (1704) and Hans Endrup Jacobsen (1946) was played in 2018 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Albert Mechlenburg Moller games or Hans Endrup Jacobsen games? This Albert Mechlenburg Moller vs Hans Endrup Jacobsen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Albert Mechlenburg Moller vs Hans Endrup Jacobsen?
Albert Mechlenburg Moller vs Hans Endrup Jacobsen (2018) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Albert Mechlenburg Moller vs Hans Endrup Jacobsen?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (ECO D85).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Albert Mechlenburg Moller vs Hans Endrup Jacobsen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.