Arne Vagn Moller vs Jakob Aabling-Thomsen
Amagermesterskabet 2010, 2010 · Result 0–1 · King's Pawn Game: Maróczy Defense (B07).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Arne Vagn Moller vs Jakob Aabling-Thomsen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Arne Vagn Moller (1826)
- Black
- Jakob Aabling-Thomsen (2339)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Amagermesterskabet 2010
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- King's Pawn Game: Maróczy Defense (B07)
About this chess game
This chess game between Arne Vagn Moller (1826) and Jakob Aabling-Thomsen (2339) was played at Amagermesterskabet 2010 in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Pawn Game: Maróczy Defense (B07). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Arne Vagn Moller games or Jakob Aabling-Thomsen games? This Arne Vagn Moller vs Jakob Aabling-Thomsen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Pawn Game: Maróczy Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Arne Vagn Moller vs Jakob Aabling-Thomsen?
Arne Vagn Moller vs Jakob Aabling-Thomsen (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Jakob Aabling-Thomsen.
What opening was played in Arne Vagn Moller vs Jakob Aabling-Thomsen?
The game opened with the King's Pawn Game: Maróczy Defense (ECO B07).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Arne Vagn Moller vs Jakob Aabling-Thomsen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.