Borja Molina Rodriguez vs Olga Guniaeva
2016 · Result ½–½ · Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation (B11).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Borja Molina Rodriguez vs Olga Guniaeva with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Borja Molina Rodriguez (2170)
- Black
- Olga Guniaeva (1723)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation (B11)
About this chess game
This chess game between Borja Molina Rodriguez (2170) and Olga Guniaeva (1723) was played in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation (B11). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Borja Molina Rodriguez games or Olga Guniaeva games? This Borja Molina Rodriguez vs Olga Guniaeva encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Borja Molina Rodriguez vs Olga Guniaeva?
Borja Molina Rodriguez vs Olga Guniaeva (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Borja Molina Rodriguez vs Olga Guniaeva?
The game opened with the Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation (ECO B11).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Borja Molina Rodriguez vs Olga Guniaeva, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.