Evgeny Molchanov vs David Cohen
Bohatirchuk mem., 2003 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Evgeny Molchanov vs David Cohen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Evgeny Molchanov
- Black
- David Cohen (1550)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Bohatirchuk mem.
- Year
- 2003
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84)
About this chess game
This chess game between Evgeny Molchanov and David Cohen (1550) was played at Bohatirchuk mem. in 2003 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Evgeny Molchanov games or David Cohen games? This Evgeny Molchanov vs David Cohen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Evgeny Molchanov vs David Cohen?
Evgeny Molchanov vs David Cohen (2003) finished 1–0, a win for Evgeny Molchanov.
What opening was played in Evgeny Molchanov vs David Cohen?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (ECO B84).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Evgeny Molchanov vs David Cohen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.