Maarten Moeller vs Martin Hammes
Wolfste ch-RLPF U20, 1994 · Result 0–1 · Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Matulovic Variation (A89).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Maarten Moeller vs Martin Hammes with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Maarten Moeller (1524)
- Black
- Martin Hammes (1637)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Wolfste ch-RLPF U20
- Year
- 1994
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Matulovic Variation (A89)
About this chess game
This chess game between Maarten Moeller (1524) and Martin Hammes (1637) was played at Wolfste ch-RLPF U20 in 1994 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Matulovic Variation (A89). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Maarten Moeller games or Martin Hammes games? This Maarten Moeller vs Martin Hammes encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Matulovic Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Maarten Moeller vs Martin Hammes?
Maarten Moeller vs Martin Hammes (1994) finished 0–1, a win for Martin Hammes.
What opening was played in Maarten Moeller vs Martin Hammes?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Matulovic Variation (ECO A89).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Maarten Moeller vs Martin Hammes, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.