Valentin Mitev vs Sevak N. Manukyan
World Cadets U12 2016, 2016 · Result 0–1 · Benko Gambit Accepted: Fully Accepted Variation (A58).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Valentin Mitev vs Sevak N. Manukyan with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Valentin Mitev (1992)
- Black
- Sevak N. Manukyan (1626)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- World Cadets U12 2016
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Benko Gambit Accepted: Fully Accepted Variation (A58)
About this chess game
This chess game between Valentin Mitev (1992) and Sevak N. Manukyan (1626) was played at World Cadets U12 2016 in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Benko Gambit Accepted: Fully Accepted Variation (A58). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Valentin Mitev games or Sevak N. Manukyan games? This Valentin Mitev vs Sevak N. Manukyan encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Benko Gambit Accepted: Fully Accepted Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Valentin Mitev vs Sevak N. Manukyan?
Valentin Mitev vs Sevak N. Manukyan (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Sevak N. Manukyan.
What opening was played in Valentin Mitev vs Sevak N. Manukyan?
The game opened with the Benko Gambit Accepted: Fully Accepted Variation (ECO A58).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Valentin Mitev vs Sevak N. Manukyan, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.