Azer Mirzoev vs Angel Delgado Serrano
38. Seville Open, 2013 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation (D36).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Azer Mirzoev vs Angel Delgado Serrano with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Azer Mirzoev (2547)
- Black
- Angel Delgado Serrano (2139)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 38. Seville Open
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation (D36)
About this chess game
This chess game between Azer Mirzoev (2547) and Angel Delgado Serrano (2139) was played at 38. Seville Open in 2013 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation (D36). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Azer Mirzoev games or Angel Delgado Serrano games? This Azer Mirzoev vs Angel Delgado Serrano encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Azer Mirzoev vs Angel Delgado Serrano?
Azer Mirzoev vs Angel Delgado Serrano (2013) finished 1–0, a win for Azer Mirzoev.
What opening was played in Azer Mirzoev vs Angel Delgado Serrano?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation (ECO D36).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Azer Mirzoev vs Angel Delgado Serrano, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.