Azer Mirzoev vs Josep Canals Bacardit
2007 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Orthodox Variation (E85).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Azer Mirzoev vs Josep Canals Bacardit with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Azer Mirzoev (2535)
- Black
- Josep Canals Bacardit (1957)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2007
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Orthodox Variation (E85)
About this chess game
This chess game between Azer Mirzoev (2535) and Josep Canals Bacardit (1957) was played in 2007 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Orthodox Variation (E85). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Azer Mirzoev games or Josep Canals Bacardit games? This Azer Mirzoev vs Josep Canals Bacardit encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Orthodox Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Azer Mirzoev vs Josep Canals Bacardit?
Azer Mirzoev vs Josep Canals Bacardit (2007) finished 1–0, a win for Azer Mirzoev.
What opening was played in Azer Mirzoev vs Josep Canals Bacardit?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Orthodox Variation (ECO E85).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Azer Mirzoev vs Josep Canals Bacardit, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.