Lucian-Costin Miron vs Dusan Rajkovic
Branko Vukmanovic Mem Open, 2011 · Result ½–½ · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Lucian-Costin Miron vs Dusan Rajkovic with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Lucian-Costin Miron (2501)
- Black
- Dusan Rajkovic (2411)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Branko Vukmanovic Mem Open
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32)
About this chess game
This chess game between Lucian-Costin Miron (2501) and Dusan Rajkovic (2411) was played at Branko Vukmanovic Mem Open in 2011 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Lucian-Costin Miron games or Dusan Rajkovic games? This Lucian-Costin Miron vs Dusan Rajkovic encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Lucian-Costin Miron vs Dusan Rajkovic?
Lucian-Costin Miron vs Dusan Rajkovic (2011) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Lucian-Costin Miron vs Dusan Rajkovic?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (ECO E32).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Lucian-Costin Miron vs Dusan Rajkovic, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.