Dragos-Olivar Minescu vs Marius-Traian Anghelus
2001 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Dragos-Olivar Minescu vs Marius-Traian Anghelus with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Dragos-Olivar Minescu (2130)
- Black
- Marius-Traian Anghelus (1998)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2001
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76)
About this chess game
This chess game between Dragos-Olivar Minescu (2130) and Marius-Traian Anghelus (1998) was played in 2001 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Dragos-Olivar Minescu games or Marius-Traian Anghelus games? This Dragos-Olivar Minescu vs Marius-Traian Anghelus encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Dragos-Olivar Minescu vs Marius-Traian Anghelus?
Dragos-Olivar Minescu vs Marius-Traian Anghelus (2001) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Dragos-Olivar Minescu vs Marius-Traian Anghelus?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (ECO E76).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Dragos-Olivar Minescu vs Marius-Traian Anghelus, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.