Aleksa Milicevic vs Tomislav Vujasic
Beograd SRB, Kvalitetna liga 2010, 2010 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System (E14).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Aleksa Milicevic vs Tomislav Vujasic with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Aleksa Milicevic (2206)
- Black
- Tomislav Vujasic (2095)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Beograd SRB, Kvalitetna liga 2010
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System (E14)
About this chess game
This chess game between Aleksa Milicevic (2206) and Tomislav Vujasic (2095) was played at Beograd SRB, Kvalitetna liga 2010 in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System (E14). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Aleksa Milicevic games or Tomislav Vujasic games? This Aleksa Milicevic vs Tomislav Vujasic encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Aleksa Milicevic vs Tomislav Vujasic?
Aleksa Milicevic vs Tomislav Vujasic (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Aleksa Milicevic.
What opening was played in Aleksa Milicevic vs Tomislav Vujasic?
The game opened with the Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System (ECO E14).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Aleksa Milicevic vs Tomislav Vujasic, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.