Oscar Milani vs Wojciech Krzyzanowski
RA-00122, 2011 · Result 0–1 · Semi-Slav Defense: Meran Variation, Pirc Variation (D48).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Oscar Milani vs Wojciech Krzyzanowski with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Oscar Milani (1822)
- Black
- Wojciech Krzyzanowski (1948)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- RA-00122
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Semi-Slav Defense: Meran Variation, Pirc Variation (D48)
About this chess game
This chess game between Oscar Milani (1822) and Wojciech Krzyzanowski (1948) was played at RA-00122 in 2011 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Semi-Slav Defense: Meran Variation, Pirc Variation (D48). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Oscar Milani games or Wojciech Krzyzanowski games? This Oscar Milani vs Wojciech Krzyzanowski encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Semi-Slav Defense: Meran Variation, Pirc Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Oscar Milani vs Wojciech Krzyzanowski?
Oscar Milani vs Wojciech Krzyzanowski (2011) finished 0–1, a win for Wojciech Krzyzanowski.
What opening was played in Oscar Milani vs Wojciech Krzyzanowski?
The game opened with the Semi-Slav Defense: Meran Variation, Pirc Variation (ECO D48).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Oscar Milani vs Wojciech Krzyzanowski, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.