Jozef Miksovský vs Miguel Ángel López Tascón
CL/2010/C2, 2010 · Result 0–1 · Ruy Lopez: Closed, Yates Variation (C91).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jozef Miksovský vs Miguel Ángel López Tascón with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jozef Miksovský (1989)
- Black
- Miguel Ángel López Tascón (2108)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- CL/2010/C2
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Closed, Yates Variation (C91)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jozef Miksovský (1989) and Miguel Ángel López Tascón (2108) was played at CL/2010/C2 in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Closed, Yates Variation (C91). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jozef Miksovský games or Miguel Ángel López Tascón games? This Jozef Miksovský vs Miguel Ángel López Tascón encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Closed, Yates Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jozef Miksovský vs Miguel Ángel López Tascón?
Jozef Miksovský vs Miguel Ángel López Tascón (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Miguel Ángel López Tascón.
What opening was played in Jozef Miksovský vs Miguel Ángel López Tascón?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Closed, Yates Variation (ECO C91).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jozef Miksovský vs Miguel Ángel López Tascón, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.