Michal Miklaszewicz vs Jakub Chmielewski
2008 · Result 0–1 · French Defense: Classical Variation, Normal Variation (C13).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Michal Miklaszewicz vs Jakub Chmielewski with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Michal Miklaszewicz (1815)
- Black
- Jakub Chmielewski (1733)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- French Defense: Classical Variation, Normal Variation (C13)
About this chess game
This chess game between Michal Miklaszewicz (1815) and Jakub Chmielewski (1733) was played in 2008 and finished 0–1. The opening was the French Defense: Classical Variation, Normal Variation (C13). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Michal Miklaszewicz games or Jakub Chmielewski games? This Michal Miklaszewicz vs Jakub Chmielewski encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Classical Variation, Normal Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Michal Miklaszewicz vs Jakub Chmielewski?
Michal Miklaszewicz vs Jakub Chmielewski (2008) finished 0–1, a win for Jakub Chmielewski.
What opening was played in Michal Miklaszewicz vs Jakub Chmielewski?
The game opened with the French Defense: Classical Variation, Normal Variation (ECO C13).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Michal Miklaszewicz vs Jakub Chmielewski, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.