Stanislav Mikheev vs Alexey Riazanov
Kazan RUS, 32. Nezhmetdinov Memorial, 2010 · Result 1–0 · Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Stanislav Mikheev vs Alexey Riazanov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Stanislav Mikheev (2310)
- Black
- Alexey Riazanov (2114)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Kazan RUS, 32. Nezhmetdinov Memorial
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85)
About this chess game
This chess game between Stanislav Mikheev (2310) and Alexey Riazanov (2114) was played at Kazan RUS, 32. Nezhmetdinov Memorial in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Stanislav Mikheev games or Alexey Riazanov games? This Stanislav Mikheev vs Alexey Riazanov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Stanislav Mikheev vs Alexey Riazanov?
Stanislav Mikheev vs Alexey Riazanov (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Stanislav Mikheev.
What opening was played in Stanislav Mikheev vs Alexey Riazanov?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (ECO D85).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Stanislav Mikheev vs Alexey Riazanov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.