Adrian Mikhalchishin vs Evgeny Raevsky
SU, date unknown · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Adrian Mikhalchishin vs Evgeny Raevsky with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Adrian Mikhalchishin (2530)
- Black
- Evgeny Raevsky (1982)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- SU
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92)
About this chess game
This chess game between Adrian Mikhalchishin (2530) and Evgeny Raevsky (1982) was played at SU and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Adrian Mikhalchishin games or Evgeny Raevsky games? This Adrian Mikhalchishin vs Evgeny Raevsky encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Adrian Mikhalchishin vs Evgeny Raevsky?
Adrian Mikhalchishin vs Evgeny Raevsky finished 1–0, a win for Adrian Mikhalchishin.
What opening was played in Adrian Mikhalchishin vs Evgeny Raevsky?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (ECO B92).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Adrian Mikhalchishin vs Evgeny Raevsky, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.