Paul-Stelian Mihalache vs Mitar Djukanovic
2018 · Result ½–½ · Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (A42).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Paul-Stelian Mihalache vs Mitar Djukanovic with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Paul-Stelian Mihalache (1732)
- Black
- Mitar Djukanovic (1824)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (A42)
About this chess game
This chess game between Paul-Stelian Mihalache (1732) and Mitar Djukanovic (1824) was played in 2018 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (A42). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Paul-Stelian Mihalache games or Mitar Djukanovic games? This Paul-Stelian Mihalache vs Mitar Djukanovic encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Paul-Stelian Mihalache vs Mitar Djukanovic?
Paul-Stelian Mihalache vs Mitar Djukanovic (2018) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Paul-Stelian Mihalache vs Mitar Djukanovic?
The game opened with the Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (ECO A42).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Paul-Stelian Mihalache vs Mitar Djukanovic, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.