Eriks Mierins vs Tomas Laurusas
TCh-LAT 2019, 2019 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Eriks Mierins vs Tomas Laurusas with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Eriks Mierins (2194)
- Black
- Tomas Laurusas (2501)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- TCh-LAT 2019
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84)
About this chess game
This chess game between Eriks Mierins (2194) and Tomas Laurusas (2501) was played at TCh-LAT 2019 in 2019 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Eriks Mierins games or Tomas Laurusas games? This Eriks Mierins vs Tomas Laurusas encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Eriks Mierins vs Tomas Laurusas?
Eriks Mierins vs Tomas Laurusas (2019) finished 0–1, a win for Tomas Laurusas.
What opening was played in Eriks Mierins vs Tomas Laurusas?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (ECO B84).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Eriks Mierins vs Tomas Laurusas, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.