Enrico Miele vs Giovanni Masciolini
7. Memorial Alvise Zichichi, 2009 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Tartakower Defense (D58).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Enrico Miele vs Giovanni Masciolini with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Enrico Miele (1710)
- Black
- Giovanni Masciolini (1879)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 7. Memorial Alvise Zichichi
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Tartakower Defense (D58)
About this chess game
This chess game between Enrico Miele (1710) and Giovanni Masciolini (1879) was played at 7. Memorial Alvise Zichichi in 2009 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Tartakower Defense (D58). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Enrico Miele games or Giovanni Masciolini games? This Enrico Miele vs Giovanni Masciolini encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Tartakower Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Enrico Miele vs Giovanni Masciolini?
Enrico Miele vs Giovanni Masciolini (2009) finished 0–1, a win for Giovanni Masciolini.
What opening was played in Enrico Miele vs Giovanni Masciolini?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Tartakower Defense (ECO D58).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Enrico Miele vs Giovanni Masciolini, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.