Timoleo Mico vs Alik Tikranian
23. EYCC Open U16 2013, 2013 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Mecking Variation (A39).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Timoleo Mico vs Alik Tikranian with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Timoleo Mico (1738)
- Black
- Alik Tikranian (2008)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 23. EYCC Open U16 2013
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Mecking Variation (A39)
About this chess game
This chess game between Timoleo Mico (1738) and Alik Tikranian (2008) was played at 23. EYCC Open U16 2013 in 2013 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Mecking Variation (A39). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Timoleo Mico games or Alik Tikranian games? This Timoleo Mico vs Alik Tikranian encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Mecking Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Timoleo Mico vs Alik Tikranian?
Timoleo Mico vs Alik Tikranian (2013) finished 0–1, a win for Alik Tikranian.
What opening was played in Timoleo Mico vs Alik Tikranian?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Mecking Variation (ECO A39).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Timoleo Mico vs Alik Tikranian, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.