Panagiotis Michelakos vs Nikolaos Aggelis
2010 · Result ½–½ · Grünfeld Defense: Brinckmann Attack, Grünfeld Gambit (D83).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Panagiotis Michelakos vs Nikolaos Aggelis with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Panagiotis Michelakos (2007)
- Black
- Nikolaos Aggelis (2329)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Brinckmann Attack, Grünfeld Gambit (D83)
About this chess game
This chess game between Panagiotis Michelakos (2007) and Nikolaos Aggelis (2329) was played in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Brinckmann Attack, Grünfeld Gambit (D83). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Panagiotis Michelakos games or Nikolaos Aggelis games? This Panagiotis Michelakos vs Nikolaos Aggelis encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Brinckmann Attack, Grünfeld Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Panagiotis Michelakos vs Nikolaos Aggelis?
Panagiotis Michelakos vs Nikolaos Aggelis (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Panagiotis Michelakos vs Nikolaos Aggelis?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Brinckmann Attack, Grünfeld Gambit (ECO D83).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Panagiotis Michelakos vs Nikolaos Aggelis, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.