Marc Meysman vs Simon Van Poucke
BEL Ch Open 2013, 2013 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation (A38).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Marc Meysman vs Simon Van Poucke with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Marc Meysman (1896)
- Black
- Simon Van Poucke (2013)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- BEL Ch Open 2013
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation (A38)
About this chess game
This chess game between Marc Meysman (1896) and Simon Van Poucke (2013) was played at BEL Ch Open 2013 in 2013 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation (A38). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Marc Meysman games or Simon Van Poucke games? This Marc Meysman vs Simon Van Poucke encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Marc Meysman vs Simon Van Poucke?
Marc Meysman vs Simon Van Poucke (2013) finished 1–0, a win for Marc Meysman.
What opening was played in Marc Meysman vs Simon Van Poucke?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation (ECO A38).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Marc Meysman vs Simon Van Poucke, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.