Lutz Meyer vs Matthias Steen
Landes-Einzelmeister, 1991 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation (A28).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Lutz Meyer vs Matthias Steen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Lutz Meyer
- Black
- Matthias Steen (2006)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Landes-Einzelmeister
- Year
- 1991
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation (A28)
About this chess game
This chess game between Lutz Meyer and Matthias Steen (2006) was played at Landes-Einzelmeister in 1991 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation (A28). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Lutz Meyer games or Matthias Steen games? This Lutz Meyer vs Matthias Steen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Lutz Meyer vs Matthias Steen?
Lutz Meyer vs Matthias Steen (1991) finished 0–1, a win for Matthias Steen.
What opening was played in Lutz Meyer vs Matthias Steen?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation (ECO A28).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Lutz Meyer vs Matthias Steen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.