Clement Meunier vs Max Leuly
Nancy FRA, Open-A Ch 2013, 2013 · Result 1–0 · Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Clement Meunier vs Max Leuly with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Clement Meunier (2025)
- Black
- Max Leuly (2096)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Nancy FRA, Open-A Ch 2013
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34)
About this chess game
This chess game between Clement Meunier (2025) and Max Leuly (2096) was played at Nancy FRA, Open-A Ch 2013 in 2013 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Clement Meunier games or Max Leuly games? This Clement Meunier vs Max Leuly encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Clement Meunier vs Max Leuly?
Clement Meunier vs Max Leuly (2013) finished 1–0, a win for Clement Meunier.
What opening was played in Clement Meunier vs Max Leuly?
The game opened with the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (ECO D34).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Clement Meunier vs Max Leuly, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.