Charlie P Metcalfe vs Nandinee Thatte
Hastings Masters 2019-20, 2019 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E92).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Charlie P Metcalfe vs Nandinee Thatte with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Charlie P Metcalfe (1867)
- Black
- Nandinee Thatte (1270)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Hastings Masters 2019-20
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E92)
About this chess game
This chess game between Charlie P Metcalfe (1867) and Nandinee Thatte (1270) was played at Hastings Masters 2019-20 in 2019 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E92). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Charlie P Metcalfe games or Nandinee Thatte games? This Charlie P Metcalfe vs Nandinee Thatte encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Charlie P Metcalfe vs Nandinee Thatte?
Charlie P Metcalfe vs Nandinee Thatte (2019) finished 1–0, a win for Charlie P Metcalfe.
What opening was played in Charlie P Metcalfe vs Nandinee Thatte?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (ECO E92).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Charlie P Metcalfe vs Nandinee Thatte, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.