Markus Messer vs Jan Steenhuis
Lenk SUI, 22. Kreuz-Open, 2010 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Markus Messer vs Jan Steenhuis with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Markus Messer (2028)
- Black
- Jan Steenhuis (2096)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Lenk SUI, 22. Kreuz-Open
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92)
About this chess game
This chess game between Markus Messer (2028) and Jan Steenhuis (2096) was played at Lenk SUI, 22. Kreuz-Open in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Markus Messer games or Jan Steenhuis games? This Markus Messer vs Jan Steenhuis encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Markus Messer vs Jan Steenhuis?
Markus Messer vs Jan Steenhuis (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Jan Steenhuis.
What opening was played in Markus Messer vs Jan Steenhuis?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (ECO B92).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Markus Messer vs Jan Steenhuis, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.