Alexey Meshcheryakov vs Sergey Titov
2015 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation (A35).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alexey Meshcheryakov vs Sergey Titov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alexey Meshcheryakov (1774)
- Black
- Sergey Titov (1945)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation (A35)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alexey Meshcheryakov (1774) and Sergey Titov (1945) was played in 2015 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation (A35). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alexey Meshcheryakov games or Sergey Titov games? This Alexey Meshcheryakov vs Sergey Titov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alexey Meshcheryakov vs Sergey Titov?
Alexey Meshcheryakov vs Sergey Titov (2015) finished 0–1, a win for Sergey Titov.
What opening was played in Alexey Meshcheryakov vs Sergey Titov?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation (ECO A35).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alexey Meshcheryakov vs Sergey Titov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.