Teofilo Mesa Mejia vs Richards Reynier Lugo Matos
2010 · Result 0–1 · King's Pawn Game: Maróczy Defense (B07).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Teofilo Mesa Mejia vs Richards Reynier Lugo Matos with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Teofilo Mesa Mejia (2121)
- Black
- Richards Reynier Lugo Matos (2010)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- King's Pawn Game: Maróczy Defense (B07)
About this chess game
This chess game between Teofilo Mesa Mejia (2121) and Richards Reynier Lugo Matos (2010) was played in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Pawn Game: Maróczy Defense (B07). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Teofilo Mesa Mejia games or Richards Reynier Lugo Matos games? This Teofilo Mesa Mejia vs Richards Reynier Lugo Matos encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Pawn Game: Maróczy Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Teofilo Mesa Mejia vs Richards Reynier Lugo Matos?
Teofilo Mesa Mejia vs Richards Reynier Lugo Matos (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Richards Reynier Lugo Matos.
What opening was played in Teofilo Mesa Mejia vs Richards Reynier Lugo Matos?
The game opened with the King's Pawn Game: Maróczy Defense (ECO B07).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Teofilo Mesa Mejia vs Richards Reynier Lugo Matos, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.