James Merriman vs Alexandros N Ethelontis
108. ch-GBR 2022, 2022 · Result ½–½ · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Rubinstein System (E40).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay James Merriman vs Alexandros N Ethelontis with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- James Merriman (1890)
- Black
- Alexandros N Ethelontis (2055)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 108. ch-GBR 2022
- Year
- 2022
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Rubinstein System (E40)
About this chess game
This chess game between James Merriman (1890) and Alexandros N Ethelontis (2055) was played at 108. ch-GBR 2022 in 2022 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Rubinstein System (E40). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more James Merriman games or Alexandros N Ethelontis games? This James Merriman vs Alexandros N Ethelontis encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Rubinstein System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won James Merriman vs Alexandros N Ethelontis?
James Merriman vs Alexandros N Ethelontis (2022) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in James Merriman vs Alexandros N Ethelontis?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Rubinstein System (ECO E40).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of James Merriman vs Alexandros N Ethelontis, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.