David Merrifield vs Roberto Chapado
13. IECG WCH-F-00006, 2009 · Result 0–1 · Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Delayed Exchange Variation (D76).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay David Merrifield vs Roberto Chapado with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- David Merrifield (2124)
- Black
- Roberto Chapado (2155)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 13. IECG WCH-F-00006
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Delayed Exchange Variation (D76)
About this chess game
This chess game between David Merrifield (2124) and Roberto Chapado (2155) was played at 13. IECG WCH-F-00006 in 2009 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Delayed Exchange Variation (D76). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more David Merrifield games or Roberto Chapado games? This David Merrifield vs Roberto Chapado encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Delayed Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won David Merrifield vs Roberto Chapado?
David Merrifield vs Roberto Chapado (2009) finished 0–1, a win for Roberto Chapado.
What opening was played in David Merrifield vs Roberto Chapado?
The game opened with the Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Delayed Exchange Variation (ECO D76).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of David Merrifield vs Roberto Chapado, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.