Sondre Merkesvik vs Nicolai Getz
TV2 IM 2017, 2017 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation (E63).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Sondre Merkesvik vs Nicolai Getz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Sondre Merkesvik (2239)
- Black
- Nicolai Getz (2403)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- TV2 IM 2017
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation (E63)
About this chess game
This chess game between Sondre Merkesvik (2239) and Nicolai Getz (2403) was played at TV2 IM 2017 in 2017 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation (E63). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Sondre Merkesvik games or Nicolai Getz games? This Sondre Merkesvik vs Nicolai Getz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Sondre Merkesvik vs Nicolai Getz?
Sondre Merkesvik vs Nicolai Getz (2017) finished 0–1, a win for Nicolai Getz.
What opening was played in Sondre Merkesvik vs Nicolai Getz?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation (ECO E63).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Sondre Merkesvik vs Nicolai Getz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.