Colin Menzies vs Muamer Alic
FICGS__CHESS__CLASS_D__000087, 2008 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation (A38).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Colin Menzies vs Muamer Alic with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Colin Menzies (2091)
- Black
- Muamer Alic (1787)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- FICGS__CHESS__CLASS_D__000087
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation (A38)
About this chess game
This chess game between Colin Menzies (2091) and Muamer Alic (1787) was played at FICGS__CHESS__CLASS_D__000087 in 2008 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation (A38). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Colin Menzies games or Muamer Alic games? This Colin Menzies vs Muamer Alic encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Colin Menzies vs Muamer Alic?
Colin Menzies vs Muamer Alic (2008) finished 1–0, a win for Colin Menzies.
What opening was played in Colin Menzies vs Muamer Alic?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation (ECO A38).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Colin Menzies vs Muamer Alic, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.