Jorge Daniel Mengeon vs Gaston Avendano
2017 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Gambit Declined: Tartakower Defense, Makogonov Exchange Variation (D59).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jorge Daniel Mengeon vs Gaston Avendano with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jorge Daniel Mengeon (1840)
- Black
- Gaston Avendano (1956)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Tartakower Defense, Makogonov Exchange Variation (D59)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jorge Daniel Mengeon (1840) and Gaston Avendano (1956) was played in 2017 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Tartakower Defense, Makogonov Exchange Variation (D59). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jorge Daniel Mengeon games or Gaston Avendano games? This Jorge Daniel Mengeon vs Gaston Avendano encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Tartakower Defense, Makogonov Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jorge Daniel Mengeon vs Gaston Avendano?
Jorge Daniel Mengeon vs Gaston Avendano (2017) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Jorge Daniel Mengeon vs Gaston Avendano?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Tartakower Defense, Makogonov Exchange Variation (ECO D59).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jorge Daniel Mengeon vs Gaston Avendano, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.