Manuel Menetrier vs Anthony R Walters
WT/M/624 corr ICCF, date unknown · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation, Main Line (E75).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Manuel Menetrier vs Anthony R Walters with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Manuel Menetrier (1810)
- Black
- Anthony R Walters
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- WT/M/624 corr ICCF
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation, Main Line (E75)
About this chess game
This chess game between Manuel Menetrier (1810) and Anthony R Walters was played at WT/M/624 corr ICCF and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation, Main Line (E75). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Manuel Menetrier games or Anthony R Walters games? This Manuel Menetrier vs Anthony R Walters encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Manuel Menetrier vs Anthony R Walters?
Manuel Menetrier vs Anthony R Walters finished 1–0, a win for Manuel Menetrier.
What opening was played in Manuel Menetrier vs Anthony R Walters?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation, Main Line (ECO E75).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Manuel Menetrier vs Anthony R Walters, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.