Diego Silva Mendes vs Jefferson Pelikian
date unknown · Result 0–1 · Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Classical Variation (D86).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Diego Silva Mendes vs Jefferson Pelikian with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Diego Silva Mendes (2062)
- Black
- Jefferson Pelikian (2405)
- Result
- 0–1
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Classical Variation (D86)
About this chess game
This chess game between Diego Silva Mendes (2062) and Jefferson Pelikian (2405) was played and finished 0–1. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Classical Variation (D86). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Diego Silva Mendes games or Jefferson Pelikian games? This Diego Silva Mendes vs Jefferson Pelikian encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Diego Silva Mendes vs Jefferson Pelikian?
Diego Silva Mendes vs Jefferson Pelikian finished 0–1, a win for Jefferson Pelikian.
What opening was played in Diego Silva Mendes vs Jefferson Pelikian?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Classical Variation (ECO D86).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Diego Silva Mendes vs Jefferson Pelikian, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.