Enrique Melcon Diez vs Eduardo Alvarez Gonzalez
2010 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: Mikenas-Carls Variation (A18).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Enrique Melcon Diez vs Eduardo Alvarez Gonzalez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Enrique Melcon Diez (1688)
- Black
- Eduardo Alvarez Gonzalez (1885)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- English Opening: Mikenas-Carls Variation (A18)
About this chess game
This chess game between Enrique Melcon Diez (1688) and Eduardo Alvarez Gonzalez (1885) was played in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: Mikenas-Carls Variation (A18). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Enrique Melcon Diez games or Eduardo Alvarez Gonzalez games? This Enrique Melcon Diez vs Eduardo Alvarez Gonzalez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Mikenas-Carls Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Enrique Melcon Diez vs Eduardo Alvarez Gonzalez?
Enrique Melcon Diez vs Eduardo Alvarez Gonzalez (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Enrique Melcon Diez vs Eduardo Alvarez Gonzalez?
The game opened with the English Opening: Mikenas-Carls Variation (ECO A18).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Enrique Melcon Diez vs Eduardo Alvarez Gonzalez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.