Steffen Meissner vs John Thorn Leeson
Corr EU/EM/M/016, 2003 · Result 0–1 · King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit (C39).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Steffen Meissner vs John Thorn Leeson with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Steffen Meissner (1986)
- Black
- John Thorn Leeson (2191)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Corr EU/EM/M/016
- Year
- 2003
- Opening
- King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit (C39)
About this chess game
This chess game between Steffen Meissner (1986) and John Thorn Leeson (2191) was played at Corr EU/EM/M/016 in 2003 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit (C39). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Steffen Meissner games or John Thorn Leeson games? This Steffen Meissner vs John Thorn Leeson encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Steffen Meissner vs John Thorn Leeson?
Steffen Meissner vs John Thorn Leeson (2003) finished 0–1, a win for John Thorn Leeson.
What opening was played in Steffen Meissner vs John Thorn Leeson?
The game opened with the King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit (ECO C39).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Steffen Meissner vs John Thorn Leeson, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.