Viesturs Meijers vs E. Chasunikova
Schwaebisch Gmuend GER, 21. Open, 2009 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System (A11).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Viesturs Meijers vs E. Chasunikova with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Viesturs Meijers (2493)
- Black
- E. Chasunikova (2302)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Schwaebisch Gmuend GER, 21. Open
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System (A11)
About this chess game
This chess game between Viesturs Meijers (2493) and E. Chasunikova (2302) was played at Schwaebisch Gmuend GER, 21. Open in 2009 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System (A11). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Viesturs Meijers games or E. Chasunikova games? This Viesturs Meijers vs E. Chasunikova encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Viesturs Meijers vs E. Chasunikova?
Viesturs Meijers vs E. Chasunikova (2009) finished 0–1, a win for E. Chasunikova.
What opening was played in Viesturs Meijers vs E. Chasunikova?
The game opened with the English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System (ECO A11).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Viesturs Meijers vs E. Chasunikova, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.