Alejandro Megias Chafer vs Jonathan Alonso Moyano
Mislata ESP, 43. Open, 2009 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation (B90).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alejandro Megias Chafer vs Jonathan Alonso Moyano with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alejandro Megias Chafer (2138)
- Black
- Jonathan Alonso Moyano (2389)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Mislata ESP, 43. Open
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation (B90)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alejandro Megias Chafer (2138) and Jonathan Alonso Moyano (2389) was played at Mislata ESP, 43. Open in 2009 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation (B90). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alejandro Megias Chafer games or Jonathan Alonso Moyano games? This Alejandro Megias Chafer vs Jonathan Alonso Moyano encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alejandro Megias Chafer vs Jonathan Alonso Moyano?
Alejandro Megias Chafer vs Jonathan Alonso Moyano (2009) finished 0–1, a win for Jonathan Alonso Moyano.
What opening was played in Alejandro Megias Chafer vs Jonathan Alonso Moyano?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation (ECO B90).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alejandro Megias Chafer vs Jonathan Alonso Moyano, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.