Petros Megaloudis vs Loukas Papadimitriou
2012 · Result ½–½ · Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish (C49).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Petros Megaloudis vs Loukas Papadimitriou with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Petros Megaloudis (1690)
- Black
- Loukas Papadimitriou (2124)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish (C49)
About this chess game
This chess game between Petros Megaloudis (1690) and Loukas Papadimitriou (2124) was played in 2012 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish (C49). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Petros Megaloudis games or Loukas Papadimitriou games? This Petros Megaloudis vs Loukas Papadimitriou encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Petros Megaloudis vs Loukas Papadimitriou?
Petros Megaloudis vs Loukas Papadimitriou (2012) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Petros Megaloudis vs Loukas Papadimitriou?
The game opened with the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish (ECO C49).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Petros Megaloudis vs Loukas Papadimitriou, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.