Houssem Eddine Meftahi vs Mohamed Ozayr Bhawoodien
2014 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation (B72).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Houssem Eddine Meftahi vs Mohamed Ozayr Bhawoodien with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Houssem Eddine Meftahi (1994)
- Black
- Mohamed Ozayr Bhawoodien (1913)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation (B72)
About this chess game
This chess game between Houssem Eddine Meftahi (1994) and Mohamed Ozayr Bhawoodien (1913) was played in 2014 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation (B72). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Houssem Eddine Meftahi games or Mohamed Ozayr Bhawoodien games? This Houssem Eddine Meftahi vs Mohamed Ozayr Bhawoodien encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Houssem Eddine Meftahi vs Mohamed Ozayr Bhawoodien?
Houssem Eddine Meftahi vs Mohamed Ozayr Bhawoodien (2014) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Houssem Eddine Meftahi vs Mohamed Ozayr Bhawoodien?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation (ECO B72).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Houssem Eddine Meftahi vs Mohamed Ozayr Bhawoodien, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.