Ernesto Efrain Medina Ucles vs Rodolfo Varron Abelgas
39. Olympiad Men, 2010 · Result 1–0 · Italian Game (C50).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ernesto Efrain Medina Ucles vs Rodolfo Varron Abelgas with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ernesto Efrain Medina Ucles (1560)
- Black
- Rodolfo Varron Abelgas (1926)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 39. Olympiad Men
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Italian Game (C50)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ernesto Efrain Medina Ucles (1560) and Rodolfo Varron Abelgas (1926) was played at 39. Olympiad Men in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Italian Game (C50). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ernesto Efrain Medina Ucles games or Rodolfo Varron Abelgas games? This Ernesto Efrain Medina Ucles vs Rodolfo Varron Abelgas encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ernesto Efrain Medina Ucles vs Rodolfo Varron Abelgas?
Ernesto Efrain Medina Ucles vs Rodolfo Varron Abelgas (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Ernesto Efrain Medina Ucles.
What opening was played in Ernesto Efrain Medina Ucles vs Rodolfo Varron Abelgas?
The game opened with the Italian Game (ECO C50).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ernesto Efrain Medina Ucles vs Rodolfo Varron Abelgas, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.