Bruno Silvestre Medeiros vs Jos2 Monteiro
3. Famalicao Open 2015, 2015 · Result 1–0 · Italian Game: Two Knights Defense (C55).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Bruno Silvestre Medeiros vs Jos2 Monteiro with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Bruno Silvestre Medeiros (1619)
- Black
- Jos2 Monteiro (1896)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 3. Famalicao Open 2015
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Italian Game: Two Knights Defense (C55)
About this chess game
This chess game between Bruno Silvestre Medeiros (1619) and Jos2 Monteiro (1896) was played at 3. Famalicao Open 2015 in 2015 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense (C55). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Bruno Silvestre Medeiros games or Jos2 Monteiro games? This Bruno Silvestre Medeiros vs Jos2 Monteiro encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Bruno Silvestre Medeiros vs Jos2 Monteiro?
Bruno Silvestre Medeiros vs Jos2 Monteiro (2015) finished 1–0, a win for Bruno Silvestre Medeiros.
What opening was played in Bruno Silvestre Medeiros vs Jos2 Monteiro?
The game opened with the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense (ECO C55).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Bruno Silvestre Medeiros vs Jos2 Monteiro, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.