David McTavish vs Walter Arencibia Rodriguez
2009 · Result ½–½ · King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit (C34).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay David McTavish vs Walter Arencibia Rodriguez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- David McTavish (2224)
- Black
- Walter Arencibia Rodriguez (2519)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit (C34)
About this chess game
This chess game between David McTavish (2224) and Walter Arencibia Rodriguez (2519) was played in 2009 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit (C34). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more David McTavish games or Walter Arencibia Rodriguez games? This David McTavish vs Walter Arencibia Rodriguez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won David McTavish vs Walter Arencibia Rodriguez?
David McTavish vs Walter Arencibia Rodriguez (2009) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in David McTavish vs Walter Arencibia Rodriguez?
The game opened with the King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit (ECO C34).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of David McTavish vs Walter Arencibia Rodriguez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.