Frank McMahon vs J. D. M.. Tymms
BCCA/C2/Tr107 (ENG), 2019 · Result 1–0 · Catalan Opening: Closed Variation, Rabinovich Variation (E09).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Frank McMahon vs J. D. M.. Tymms with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Frank McMahon (1833)
- Black
- J. D. M.. Tymms (1869)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- BCCA/C2/Tr107 (ENG)
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Catalan Opening: Closed Variation, Rabinovich Variation (E09)
About this chess game
This chess game between Frank McMahon (1833) and J. D. M.. Tymms (1869) was played at BCCA/C2/Tr107 (ENG) in 2019 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Catalan Opening: Closed Variation, Rabinovich Variation (E09). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Frank McMahon games or J. D. M.. Tymms games? This Frank McMahon vs J. D. M.. Tymms encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Catalan Opening: Closed Variation, Rabinovich Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Frank McMahon vs J. D. M.. Tymms?
Frank McMahon vs J. D. M.. Tymms (2019) finished 1–0, a win for Frank McMahon.
What opening was played in Frank McMahon vs J. D. M.. Tymms?
The game opened with the Catalan Opening: Closed Variation, Rabinovich Variation (ECO E09).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Frank McMahon vs J. D. M.. Tymms, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.