Thomas McKigney vs Jorge David Morera Morera
WS/A/137, 2018 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Thomas McKigney vs Jorge David Morera Morera with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Thomas McKigney
- Black
- Jorge David Morera Morera (1530)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- WS/A/137
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02)
About this chess game
This chess game between Thomas McKigney and Jorge David Morera Morera (1530) was played at WS/A/137 in 2018 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Thomas McKigney games or Jorge David Morera Morera games? This Thomas McKigney vs Jorge David Morera Morera encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Thomas McKigney vs Jorge David Morera Morera?
Thomas McKigney vs Jorge David Morera Morera (2018) finished 0–1, a win for Jorge David Morera Morera.
What opening was played in Thomas McKigney vs Jorge David Morera Morera?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (ECO D02).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Thomas McKigney vs Jorge David Morera Morera, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.