Daniele Mazzarini vs Stanislao Pierantozzi
I Weekend A, 2011 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Indian Defense: Yates Variation (E16).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Daniele Mazzarini vs Stanislao Pierantozzi with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Daniele Mazzarini (1825)
- Black
- Stanislao Pierantozzi (1971)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- I Weekend A
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Queen's Indian Defense: Yates Variation (E16)
About this chess game
This chess game between Daniele Mazzarini (1825) and Stanislao Pierantozzi (1971) was played at I Weekend A in 2011 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Indian Defense: Yates Variation (E16). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Daniele Mazzarini games or Stanislao Pierantozzi games? This Daniele Mazzarini vs Stanislao Pierantozzi encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Indian Defense: Yates Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Daniele Mazzarini vs Stanislao Pierantozzi?
Daniele Mazzarini vs Stanislao Pierantozzi (2011) finished 1–0, a win for Daniele Mazzarini.
What opening was played in Daniele Mazzarini vs Stanislao Pierantozzi?
The game opened with the Queen's Indian Defense: Yates Variation (ECO E16).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Daniele Mazzarini vs Stanislao Pierantozzi, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.