Karl-Heinz Mäuer vs Edmund Belter
LD/PRELIM S 1, 2020 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Karl-Heinz Mäuer vs Edmund Belter with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Karl-Heinz Mäuer (1891)
- Black
- Edmund Belter (1720)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- LD/PRELIM S 1
- Year
- 2020
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92)
About this chess game
This chess game between Karl-Heinz Mäuer (1891) and Edmund Belter (1720) was played at LD/PRELIM S 1 in 2020 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Karl-Heinz Mäuer games or Edmund Belter games? This Karl-Heinz Mäuer vs Edmund Belter encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Karl-Heinz Mäuer vs Edmund Belter?
Karl-Heinz Mäuer vs Edmund Belter (2020) finished 1–0, a win for Karl-Heinz Mäuer.
What opening was played in Karl-Heinz Mäuer vs Edmund Belter?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (ECO B92).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Karl-Heinz Mäuer vs Edmund Belter, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.