Pierre Matteau vs Rene Fournier
Quebec Ch intercoll., date unknown · Result 1–0 · Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation (E18).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Pierre Matteau vs Rene Fournier with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Pierre Matteau
- Black
- Rene Fournier
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Quebec Ch intercoll.
- Opening
- Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation (E18)
About this chess game
This chess game between Pierre Matteau and Rene Fournier was played at Quebec Ch intercoll. and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation (E18). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Pierre Matteau games or Rene Fournier games? This Pierre Matteau vs Rene Fournier encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Pierre Matteau vs Rene Fournier?
Pierre Matteau vs Rene Fournier finished 1–0, a win for Pierre Matteau.
What opening was played in Pierre Matteau vs Rene Fournier?
The game opened with the Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation (ECO E18).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Pierre Matteau vs Rene Fournier, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.