Vadim Matsenko vs Dmitry Skorokhodov
2009 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Classical Variation (D69).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Vadim Matsenko vs Dmitry Skorokhodov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Vadim Matsenko (2107)
- Black
- Dmitry Skorokhodov (1862)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Classical Variation (D69)
About this chess game
This chess game between Vadim Matsenko (2107) and Dmitry Skorokhodov (1862) was played in 2009 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Classical Variation (D69). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Vadim Matsenko games or Dmitry Skorokhodov games? This Vadim Matsenko vs Dmitry Skorokhodov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Vadim Matsenko vs Dmitry Skorokhodov?
Vadim Matsenko vs Dmitry Skorokhodov (2009) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Vadim Matsenko vs Dmitry Skorokhodov?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Classical Variation (ECO D69).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Vadim Matsenko vs Dmitry Skorokhodov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.